By Jim Shimabukuro (assisted by Copilot)
Editor
December 2025 was a month marked not only by rapid advances in artificial intelligence but also by several highly visible failures that revealed the fragility of the industry’s momentum. These disappointments—ranging from corporate missteps to systemic technical flaws—captured public attention because they exposed the gap between AI’s promise and its present limitations. Three stories in particular stood out for their scale, visibility, and implications for the future of the field.
The first major disappointment came from Apple’s ongoing struggle to modernize Siri and its broader “Apple Intelligence” initiative. In the article “Apple AI chief to step down in wake of Siri failure” by Matthew Field, published December 2, 2025, the company confirmed that its AI chief, John Giannandrea, would retire following a series of embarrassing technical failures. This matters because Apple, long considered a leader in consumer technology, has fallen dramatically behind competitors such as OpenAI and Google in conversational AI and generative intelligence. The article highlights how Apple’s attempts to revamp Siri resulted in “push notifications containing AI‑generated fake news” and persistent hallucinations—errors that eroded user trust and raised questions about Apple’s ability to compete. As the article bluntly states, “Its attempts to revamp its Siri voice assistant and launch its own ‘Apple Intelligence’ technology have resulted in a series of embarrassing glitches.”
A second disappointment emerged from the broader industry’s ongoing struggle with hallucinations—AI systems confidently generating false or fabricated information. This issue was documented in “The 3 biggest AI fails of 2025” by Christianna Silva, published by Mashable on December 4, 2025. The piece chronicles how hallucinations continued to plague AI systems across academia, government, and law, despite years of warnings and billions invested in safety research. This matters because hallucinations undermine the reliability of AI in high‑stakes environments, from legal filings to scientific research, where accuracy is non‑negotiable. The persistence of this problem in late 2025 demonstrated that even the most advanced models still lacked robust grounding mechanisms. Silva captures the frustration succinctly: “AI has been making stuff up for some time; hallucinate was the word of the year in 2023 for good reason.”
A third disappointment came from the governance and data‑quality side of the AI ecosystem. In “Disappointments in AI” by Melody Smith, published on Taxodiary on December 5, 2025, the author argues that poor data governance remains one of the most persistent and damaging failures in the field. This matters because AI systems are only as reliable as the data they are trained on, and organizations continue to deploy models built on biased, incomplete, or poorly managed datasets. The article emphasizes that without strong governance, AI can “go from game‑changer to headache fast,” leading to flawed predictions, reputational harm, and systemic risk. Smith summarizes the disappointment clearly: “Feed it biased or messy data, and you risk flawed predictions, poor outcomes and even damage to your reputation.”
Together, these three stories illustrate the multifaceted nature of AI’s challenges at the end of 2025. Apple’s stumbles showed that even the world’s most valuable companies can falter when trying to integrate generative AI into consumer products. The persistence of hallucinations revealed that foundational technical problems remain unsolved. And the ongoing crisis in data governance demonstrated that the industry’s infrastructure is still not mature enough to support the ambitions placed upon it. These disappointments do not diminish AI’s transformative potential, but they serve as a reminder that progress is neither linear nor guaranteed—and that the path to trustworthy, reliable AI requires far more than hype.
[End]
Filed under: Uncategorized |
Educational Technology and Change Journal 
Leave a comment