Harry Keller founded Smart Science® Education Inc. in 1981 and incorporated in 1983. After 15 years of providing contract consulting services mostly to Fortune 500 companies, he and his partner created the Smart Science® core learning system to provide high-quality science laboratory experience to students through the Internet. The system now has 150 integrated instructional lab units covering all major sciences for grades 6-14, and its core technologies have been patented. Smart Science® system clients include Stanford University, Johns Hopkins University, eight state online schools, the largest online charter school in Arizona (Primavera Online Learning), many public schools in New York City and around the country, and a number of private education providers such as Apex Learning.
Keller earned his BS in chemistry from the California Institute of Techology and his PhD in analytical chemistry from Columbia University. After a postdoctoral fellowship at Colorado State University, he was hired as an assistant professor of chemistry at Northeastern University. He has also served as chair of the Northeastern Section of the American Chemical Society and as a reviewer for Analytical Chemistry. In the computer industry, Keller has worked as a principal programmer and software development manager for Digital Equipment Corporation and was vice president at Access Technology.
Keller focuses his energies on supporting learning through Internet technologies and on providing quality learning experiences to students in poor rural areas and in underserved urban communities. Currently that focus involves science.
ETC Publications
Is the LEAD Commission Right About Education Technology?
Technology Bang for Buck
Farnsworth’s Fusion: What’s It All About?
Martian Rhapsody: Chapter 1 – Landing
Mars – A New Beginning
Mars One: Exciting Adventure or Hoax?
Robert E. Yager Discusses ‘Hands-On’ Science Education
Next Generation Science Standards Fall Flat
Is Building Apps for Everyone?
Need More Software Engineers? Teach Thinking Skills Better
Blame Poorly Designed Technology Instead of Teacher Training
The Real Story on Online Science Labs
For Schools, Laptops Are Still Better Than Tablets
What Can Tomorrow’s Students Expect?
Teaching Science Teachers Science
NAEP and the Future of Science Education
How Anti-Evolution Helps to Define Science
Ravitch Ravages Reforms
Edinburgh Manifesto: A Disturbing Subtext
Evolution Still Under Attack After 150 Years
Hawaii Teachers Reject RTT: What Did Arne Expect?
U.S. Education Is Getting Worse, Not Better
We Can Fix Our Public Schools If We Care Enough
Learning Software – Must Move Beyond the Trivial
Instructional Technologists Are Needed in K-16
The Arts Is Not Only About Music
The Importance of Tacit Knowledge in Science Educators
A Comment on Lessig’s e-G8 Talk
Rupert Murdoch on the Money About Importance of Software
Real Changes in Education Are Rare
Science Education and Society
Science Fairs Failing?
Algebra and the iPad
Learning to Learn, Learning to Teach
Information Overload and Education
Fixing Middle School Science and Math
Breaking Down Barriers
‘Learning by Playing’: Seven Tips for Game Designers
Technological Literacy: The Key to Education Reform
Time to Push the Ed Reform Pendulum Sideways
Is ‘Technology Expert’ an Oxymoron?
‘Computer Science’ Contains Little or No Science
Leaders Must Be Visionary Risk-takers to Change Our Schools
A Response to Marc Prensky’s ‘Simple Changes’
Flight of the ‘Solar Impulse’ – Educationally Relevant?
The Latest Whiz-Bang Gadgets vs. Real Change
Universities Vanishing?
Retort: Opportunities to Learn from Oil Spills
Retort: The Challenge for Our Schools: Thomas Friedman and Education
Retort: Thomas H. Huxley on Teaching Science
Retort: Berkeley High School May Eliminate Science Labs
Retort: Deconstructing STEM
Retort: The Best of Education, the Worst of Education
Interactive Whiteboards – Fix or Fad?
i3 Funding Process Unfair to Small Businesses
Tough Decisions for Extraordinary Times
Effective Leaders Challenge Teachers to Continually Grow
Investing in Innovation Fund: Criteria May Be a Barrier to Some Innovators
Science Labs and Accessibility
Science Labs Don’t Have to Cost an Arm and a Leg
A Review of ‘The Opportunity Equation’
Can Virtual Labs Replace Hands-On?
India Steps Forward in Science Education
Science Education Retrospective
If We Don’t, Someone Else Will
Innovation in Education: What? How?
Ineffective Use of Computers in Schools
Making a Case for Online Science Labs
Simulated Labs Are Anathema to Most Scientists
Filed under: Uncategorized



















Cathy Gunn: "Traditional methods for effecting change at my institution aren’t getting us even to a trickle yet, let alone to thinking about or planning for a wave!" (

















